Prediction of Blaine Willenborg vs Cesar Kist Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Willenborg vs C. Kist

Blaine Willenborg

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

119

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Cesar Kist

BRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

119

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Willenborg 1 - 0 Kist

They have played 2 sets in total, with Blaine Willenborg winning 2 and Cesar Kist winning 0. The last match between Blaine Willenborg and Cesar Kist was at the Sao Paulo CH, 03-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Blaine Willenborg getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Willenborg	1
Kist	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Sao Paulo CH(11-03-86)

Stats

Blaine Willenborg

Cesar Kist

B. Willenborg vs C. Kist H2H Profile

B. Willenborg	Stats	C. Kist
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
42.50% (51-69)	Career Total W/L	40.00% (54-81)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. Willenborg vs C. Kist Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Blaine Willenborg has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cesar Kist has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Blaine Willenborg, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cesar Kist has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Blaine Willenborg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cesar Kist has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Blaine Willenborg has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cesar Kist winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Blaine Willenborg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 40/49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Cesar Kist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 44/56), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 10/22).
Player level: In the last year, Blaine Willenborg has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cesar Kist has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Blaine Willenborg winning 1 times and Cesar Kist being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Blaine Willenborg winning 2 and Cesar Kist winning 0.
The last match between Blaine Willenborg and Cesar Kist was at the Sao Paulo CH, 03-11-1986, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Blaine Willenborg getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Blaine Willenborg has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cesar Kist has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Blaine Willenborg has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cesar Kist has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Blaine Willenborg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cesar Kist has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Blaine Willenborg vs Cesar Kist Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. Willenborg vs C. Kist H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. Willenborg	Stats	C. Kist
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. Willenborg Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Charleston - 25-04-1988
R3 Aaron KricksteinA. Krickstein	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Lyon - 08-02-1988
R3 Jerome PotierJ. Potier	L	7-6 4-6 6-0	Stats
Guaruja - 25-01-1988
R3 Roberto ArguelloR. Arguello	L	7-5 3-6 6-3	Stats
Vina Del Mar CH - 18-01-1988
R4 Jim CourierJ. Courier	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
R3 Jose Antonio FernandezJ. Antonio	W	1-6 7-6 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Kist Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brasilia - 09-09-1991
R1 Mauro MenezesM. Menezes	L	2-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Sao Paulo CH - 04-12-1989
R3 Jaime OncinsJ. Oncins	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Goiania CH - 21-08-1989
R3 Marcos HocevarM. Hocevar	W	7-6 6-3	Stats
R4 Givaldo BarbosaG. Barbosa	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Brasilia CH - 14-08-1989
R2 Fernando RoeseF. Roese	L	4-6 6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

B. Willenborg vs C. Kist Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. Willenborg	Stats	C. Kist
42.50% (51/69)	YTD Win/Loss	40.00% (54/81)
43.15% (126/166)	Sets Win/Loss	42.22% (133/182)
47.42% (1303/1445)	Games Win/Loss	46.79% (1378/1567)
36.00% (9/16)	Hard Win/Loss	31.25% (10/22)
44.94% (40/49)	Clay Win/Loss	44.00% (44/56)
40.00% (2/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/3)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
432.38	Average Opponent Rank	437.74
25.00% (2/6)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
50.00% (2/2)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
38.67% (29/46)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (6/18)
54.55% (18/15)	Challenger W/L	43.24% (48/63)
44% (49/112)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	40% (53/134)
25% (2/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
49% (20/41)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (20/44)
78% (45/35)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (51/42)
22% (45/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (51/9)
21% (75/16)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (84/12)